|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
META DATA TUTORIAL |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full
Day Tutorial 9:00-17:30 |
META DATA FUNDAMENTALS
What is meta data? IT staff in most enterprises have a common problem. How can they convince managers to plan, budget, and apply resources for meta data management? What is meta data and why is it important? What technologies are involved? Internet and intranet technologies are part of the answer and will get the immediate attention of management. XML is the other technology. The current popularity of XML and e-business has served to rekindle interest in meta data management. Both require the reconciliation of business data and jargon in order to deliver the correct information to the desired knowledge workers so that they can speak the same language. This tutorial will discuss these and related meta data issues. Metadata
Metadata Engineering
Metadata Management/ToolKit
Metadata Recovery Examples
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| INFORMATION QUALITY TUTORIALS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full
Day Tutorial 9:00-17:30 |
THE ABCs OF INFORMATION QUALITY: A Primer for Information Quality Improvement
While we have for some time recognised the requirement for quality of products and services to be competitive, organisations are just now becoming aware of the problems in information quality and how poor information quality is hurting both competitiveness and the bottom line. Information quality improvement is not an academic exercise – it is a required tool for business performance excellence in the Information Age. In this tutorial Larry describes the fundamental principles of information quality. He describes how an organisation can improve the quality and value of its information resources. He describes metrics for measuring information quality and management principles for implementing an effective information quality environment. Larry describes how organisations have successfully implemented information quality processes to improve the effectiveness of their business and information system processes. A. Assessment: Information Quality Inspection
B. Betterment: Information Quality Improvement
C. Culture: Creating an Environment for Sustainable Information Quality
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full
Day Tutorial 9:00-17:30 |
DATA STEWARDSHIP – A FRAMEWORK FOR ACHIEVING AND MAINTAINING DATA INTEGRITY IN THE DATA WAREHOUSE
Data integrity can be defined as "The Accuracy, Timeliness, Consistency and Completeness of Data." Achieving and maintaining high integrity in the Data Warehouse is crucial to the overall value of the Data Warehouse itself. Contrary to popular belief, the process of achieving a high level of data integrity is heavily dependent of the involvement of the business across multiple fronts. What is needed to achieve this objective is framework that optimises the collaboration between the business and I.T. to build a foundation for sustained and measurable data quality improvement. Defining and implementing this framework, "Data Stewardship", is the focus of this tutorial. During this session we will develop a firm understanding of the base data quality issues that impact the integrity of data in the Data Warehouse. Next, we will develop an understanding of the Data Stewardship approach for defining and implementing a comprehensive data quality improvement program that will result in sustained improvements in data quality, not only in the Data Warehouse, but in the sources systems that feed it as well. This tutorial will conclude with a case study that will help participants tie the concepts together in order to accelerate application of the learned principles in their organisation. Topics addressed include:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DAMA TUTORIALS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Full
Day Tutorial 9:00-17:30 |
ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE
Enterprise Architecture is fundamental for enabling an enterprise to assimilate internal changes in response to the external dynamics and uncertainties of the information age environment. It not only constitutes a baseline for managing change, but also provides the mechanism by which the reality of the enterprise and its systems can be aligned with management intentions. The objective of this seminar is to build an understanding of the concepts of Enterprise Architecture and develop a sense of urgency for implementing those concepts in a modern enterprise. Introduction to Enterprise Architecture
Industrial Age Break-Down
Information Age Build-Up
Reducing Time-To-Market
Implementation practicalities
Conclusions
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
VALUE-ADDED ATTRIBUTE MODELLING
Attributes are often the "poor relation" in the modelling process. A number of bad practices are to be found in many system acquisition projects (whether building or buying). These include confusing requirement and solution (failure to treat attributes differently at different levels of the Zachman framework), disintegrating complex attributes at too early a stage of analysis and leaving the definition of derived attributes and constraints on attributes to process modellers. The result is often a system that fails to meet business requirements. This tutorial provides some practical techniques for the thorough modelling of attributes that brings benefits to the whole system acquisition project, including process definition.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Half
Day Tutorial 9:00-12:30 |
THE TEN BEST WAYS TO ACHIEVE DATA RESOURCE QUALITY
Why is the data resource in public and private sector organisations failing to adequately support their information needs? What do organisations consistently do, or not do, to ruin one of their most critical resources? Why have organisations allowed this situation to happen and to continue for so long? What bad habits should be avoided and what good practices should be followed to ensure a high-quality data resource that supports business activities? People are asking these questions with increasing regularity. The underlying theme of most of these questions is what can organisations do to prevent any further data disparity. The answer begins by identifying the bad habits that organisations have and the impacts of those bad habits. Next, the bad habits must be turned into good practices that directly benefit the organisation. The good practices that produce early benefits become the best practices for quick-starting an initiative to improve meta-data quality. This tutorial covers the bad habits that lead to a low-quality data resource, their impacts, and the good practices that result in a high quality data resource, their benefits, and the best practices for achieving early successes. Delegates will get an overview about:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Half
Day Tutorial 14:00-17:30 |
DATA MODELLING CONTENTIOUS ISSUES
A highly interactive session where attendees will evaluate the options and best practices of common and advance data modelling issues, such as:
Delegates in this session will be presented with an issue along with a range of responses or possible solutions. Attendees will vote on their preferred response, and then the group as a whole will discuss the results, along with the merits of each possible response. If the specific issue has been discussed in other presentations, a summary of the responses of the other groups will be presented. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Half
Day Tutorial 14:00-17:30 |
THE SEMANTIC INTEGRATION OF DATA FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES INTO A COMMON DATABASE
More and more, data stewards (DBAs, data architects, data warehouse designers, etc.) are being asked to integrate data from multiple, dissimilar sources into a common database. This can be because of companies merging or acquiring each other, or the effort to integrate customer data from various applications to support a more aggressive CRM. Or, it can be when a data warehouse seeks to integrate cause and effect data from disparate source applications. Successful mapping of source data to target field depends upon a comprehensive understanding of the business meaning and data architectures of each source, and the target. By semantic, we mean ensuring that each source data field has the comparable meaning, scope, and normal behaviour (not merely field-name and format) corresponding with its peer source field(s). Merging two sources is exciting enough. Merging three or more can be terrifying. This tutorial will cover a wide range of techniques showing many practical examples of actual data. It is not enough to use documentation (file descriptions, etc.) of sources (which may be obsolete). One must look at the actual data, all of it. We will discuss step-by-step techniques for uncovering data anomalies, data quality problems, and semantical discontinuities in how a field is used. We start by creating an inventory of the data, its architecture, and its behaviour at each source, from the high-level view down to the specific, detailed behaviour of each field and column, and inter-dependencies. Techniques in data profiling and domain studies will be shown in detail with examples of surprise findings. For example a field may be used in one way for one entity subtype, and in a different way for another subtype. Never underestimate the creativity of application owners to use a field for a purpose different than its original intent. Even the treatment of negative values (such as total invoice amount) may be different for different sources. Then, the task of evaluating the commonality of any pair of source fields, and determining the appropriate target field in the target database is not for the naive. We will review some mistakes of wimp analysts who made unwarranted assumptions about source data, without even looking at the actual business data (gasp!). In contrast, we will review sound analytical techniques for getting the correct mapping and translation to the target database. Also, data quality issues such as validity, completeness, richness, and accuracy will be discussed. Finally, we will survey techniques of establishing an on-going data surveillance program to ensure that later production-ized loads of data will not be caught by surprise when a source changes definitions or scope of the data it supplies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||